Re: file format extensions

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:20 AM Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > It seems to me a short page in the docs.raku.org would > be useful with the various file extensions I'm +1 for this. I'm also +1 for recommending `.rakudoc` instead of `.pod6`. At least, for documentation files related to raku; what

Re: file format extensions

rakudoc has been chosen as the official extension long ago. Best regards, Vadim Belman > On Dec 30, 2021, at 11:13 AM, Tom Browder wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 06:26 Elizabeth Mattijsen > wrote: > +1 from me. Shouldn't that be a .rakudoc file ? :-) > > Or

Re: file format extensions

On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 06:26 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > +1 from me. Shouldn't that be a .rakudoc file ? :-) Or .rakupod?

Re: file format extensions

+1 from me too. I'd also add test files to the list, which have at least .t and .rakutest (with the latter being preferred AFAK, so that GitHub will start highlighting them correctly). I'm not sure if there are other acceptable extensions for test files, though?

Re: file format extensions

I also agree that a page on docs would be helpful. But my point for this reply is about renaming POD6. I don't think this makes much sense and barely would ever happen. It is a legacy name, like NQP. Best regards, Vadim Belman > On Dec 30, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > >

Re: file format extensions

+1 from me. Shouldn't that be a .rakudoc file ? :-) > On 30 Dec 2021, at 12:20, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > I'm revising how I name files that are included in my modules. With the name > change to Raku, the file extensions also changed for script and module files. > > In addition Jonathan

file format extensions

I'm revising how I name files that are included in my modules. With the name change to Raku, the file extensions also changed for script and module files. In addition Jonathan has defined some format extensions for Cro files, and I am sure there would be other developers who would like to