Re: Where can I find a Perl 6 langauge reference?

Thomas Wittek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Where is the best place to take a look at, when I want to start > experimenting with Perl 6 and pugs? As your email address looks german, maybe my (german) notes about compiling my first Pugs is helpful to you: http://dresden-pm.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view

Re: Where can I find a Perl 6 langauge reference?

* Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-19 09:10]: > As your email address looks german, Thomas is a fellow cologne.pm’er. :-) > http://dresden-pm.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/PM/PugsFirstBlood Nice work. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: Where can I find a Perl 6 langauge reference?

Is there a perl6-user-doc wiki? It might be a great way to write documentation. Free collaborative documentation for a free collaborative language - what could be better? Let alone Wikipedia - Wikis can be even greater than you think. For example, check out this site: http://wiki.osdc.org.il/in

Windows Binaries for Pugs

Hi All, I just wanted to let you know that there are some Windows binaries of Pugs avaliable from Jonathan Worthington (http://www.jwcs.net/~jonathan/perl6/). They seem to be a bit out of date (last update was at Monday, 10-Apr-2006 05:29:30 CDT) but should get you started. Regards, Chris

Re: Windows Binaries for Pugs

At this stage, are binaries even worth it? Judging from my lurking on #perl6, things are moving so fast that anything but a regular nightly-built binary would be too out of date. Seems like svn is the way to go. -James At 11:58 AM -0400 5/19/06, Chris Yocum wrote: Hi All, I just want

Re: Windows Binaries for Pugs

True. Although, I would say that for those who only want to tinker with the language, this might be the most convenient way to do so. I have already started to work with it and I am liking what I am seeing. On 5/19/06, James Peregrino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At this stage, are binaries even

Re: Where can I find a Perl 6 langauge reference?

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 03:29:38PM -0700, David Romano wrote: > On 5/18/06, Michael Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Like Thomas, I'm interested in having a go, in my case I'd like to > >install something I can play with. The link is appreciated but what I > >was hoping for was a simple set of

Re: Windows Binaries for Pugs

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:24:57PM -0400, James Peregrino wrote: > At this stage, are binaries even worth it? Judging from my lurking > on #perl6, things are moving so fast that anything but a regular > nightly-built binary would be too out of date. Seems like svn is > the way to go. Binarie

Hyperop question

$Larry has just updated the pod: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod =head1 Changes to existing operators -If one argument is insufficiently dimensioned, Perl "upgrades" it: +If either argument is insufficiently dimensioned, Perl "upgrades" it: (3,8,2,9,3,8) >>-<< 1; # (2,7,1,8,2,7)

Re: Hyperop question

Never mind: New Revision: 9303 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod Log: Typo from aufrank++. Feeble attempt to make .foo optional on nodes that only contain children. Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod == ---

Re: Windows Binaries for Pugs

I think nightly builds are great, especially considering that most people don't have a Haskell environment set up. Keep the builds coming! Especially ones with parrot and perl5 integration :-) (Yes, I'm lazy) Rutger On Fri, 19 May 2006 12:33:56 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 20