Re: perl6 and a multi-interpreted-language example

2006-09-18 Thread Ben Morrow
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall): > Okay, combining all these approaches minimalistically but without > golfing we get something like: > > my @numbers = sort { rand }, constant @goal = 1..9; > my $steps = 0; > > until @numbers ~~ @goal { >say [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >@

Re: more on perl5 modules

2006-09-18 Thread Richard Hainsworth
I copied your neat program into a file, called it gtk2test.p6 and got pugs gtk2_test.p6 *** unexpected ":" expecting term postfix, operator, ";" or end of input at gtk2_test.p6 line 2, column 56 However, I am using pugs from the debian package and not directly from the repository. So pe

Re: more on perl5 modules

2006-09-18 Thread Juerd
Richard Hainsworth skribis 2006-09-18 17:18 (+0400): > However, I am using pugs from the debian package and not directly from > the repository. So perhaps, the problem is I am not using the latest > version of pugs. That version is rather old in our universe :) -- korajn salutojn, juerd waal

Re: more on perl5 modules

2006-09-18 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Richard Hainsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-18 15:20]: > I copied your neat program into a file, called it gtk2test.p6 > and got > pugs gtk2_test.p6 > *** >unexpected ":" >expecting term postfix, operator, ";" or end of input >at gtk2_test.p6 line 2, column 56 Note my translation

Re: the CGI.pm in Perl 6

2006-09-18 Thread David Cantrell
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: The thing that CGI.pm does is put in one place everything you need for a simple web form. And there's an amazing number of applications for this... putting a "contact us" page on an otherwise static site comes to mind immediately. Sure, if you're building a complex sh

Re: the CGI.pm in Perl 6

2006-09-18 Thread Fagyal Csongor
> Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > >> The thing that CGI.pm does is put in one place everything you need for >> a simple web form. And there's an amazing number of applications for >> this... putting a "contact us" page on an otherwise static site comes >> to mind immediately. >> >> Sure, if you're bu

use perl5:CGI as a solution (was: Re: the CGI.pm in Perl 6)

2006-09-18 Thread Mark Stosberg
Aankhen wrote: > > The major feeling was that there should be no CGI.pm (if someone was > hellbent on using it, they could use the Perl 5 module). In theory, "use perl5:CGI" could be a fine solution. In practice, it hasn't worked out well for me. Even something that seems simple like passing a h