http://sial.org/pbot/37077
A slightly improved syntax, as per jnthn++ suggestion...
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 18:08 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Carrera wrote
> > Ok, try again:
> > % perl6 rpn.pl "2 2+"
> > 2 2
> You can probably fix that with a different split() line. I tried using
> i
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 19:45 -0400, Minimiscience escreveu:
> my $ls = @a.shift;
> my $rs = @a.shift;
> To:
> my $rs = @a.pop;
> my $ls = @a.pop;
Thanks... this was already solved in the latest version I sent
http://sial.org/pbot/37089
daniel
Em Dom, 2009-06-07 às 00:07 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> >> Are you planning to write a post explaining how your program works?
> > Maybe, but if you want to beat me to it, feel free ;)
> >> I figure that the explanation is as useful as the example. I sure
> >> spent a lo
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 13:18 -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> http://sial.org/pbot/37077
> A slightly improved syntax, as per jnthn++ suggestion...
My list mail has been very delayed, so this may be out of sequence, but
in case no one mentioned it yet:
http://sial.org/pbot/37102
(That's ruoso++'
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 14:06 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> I just wrote a blog post showing how to make a reverse polish notation
> calculator in Perl 6. In the process I show some of Perl 6's grammar
> features.
TIMTOWTDI ;)
http://sial.org/pbot/37075
daniel
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 18:22 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > er... that's because I didn't tried to implement it... but it
> certainly
> > is possible to, just by declaring the :(@a, Num $a) variant...
> Well, * is implemented, so I guess you are talking about complex
> ex
Em Sáb, 2009-06-06 às 19:51 +0200, Daniel Carrera escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > Yes... that's what wasn't implemented... But now it is ;)
> > http://sial.org/pbot/37085
> Close, but...
> % perl6 rpn.pl "5 4 + 3 / 5 3 - *"
> -6
> That should be a positive 6.
Fixed now!
http://sial.org/pbot/37
