On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 12:53:17PM +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
Given the current version number scheme (year.month), it's highly
unlikely that we'll ever see a Rakudo 1.0.
So I'd change that to after a production
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 10:27 -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
- What was the first production release of Linux?
- At what point was each of the above declared a production
release;
was it concurrent with the release, or some time afterwards?
Linus declared what his goals for 1.0 were
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:33, Guy Hulbert gwhulb...@eol.ca wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 18:25 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
At least have the decency to change the e-mail subject when the
discussion's
subject has changed!
IMO, the subject changed at the second post. I was just
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 06:25:18PM +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:05, Guy Hulbert gwhulb...@eol.ca wrote:
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 10:27 -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
- What was the first production release of Linux?
- At what point was each of the
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 18:45 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
You guys stopped discussing the questionnaire a LONG time before PM
answered. There has hardly been a handful of helpful posts.
That's what I said and that was my first post.
Getting back on topic, I, for one, would like to know
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 19:02, Guy Hulbert gwhulb...@eol.ca wrote:
Many people seem to be proposing questions which ask people's opinions
of things which are factual and can be answered readily by reading the
documentation.
For example, your question can be partly answered by looking at the
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 20:10 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
It does not, however, answer any of the question_s_ I wanted asked, and
which others have wanted asked, not even partially.
I haven't seen any such requests from you on this thread. Is this
discussion happening elsewhere as well ?
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Guy Hulbert gwhulb...@eol.ca wrote:
I'm not sure what 'TPF survey' is.
http://survey.perlfoundation.org/
Gabor
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Patrick R. Michaud pmich...@pobox.com wrote:
Out of curiosity (because I think it will illuminate some of the difficulty
Rakudo devs have in declaring something to be a production release):
- What constitues a production release?
The developers judge that the
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Guy Hulbert gwhulb...@eol.ca wrote:
I think freezing a subset of what you eventually want to have and then
getting as close as you can on a fairly tight schedule is the best way
to get buy-in from users.
That is generally what I expect to see in a production
On Sun, 2011-02-01 at 22:30 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
Thanks. Found that already. It does not list the questions asked and I
can't figure out how to download the PDF report or to clone the
repository it's in on github.
Jan Involdstadt suggested I look at TPF website and following the
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote:
On 01/01/2011 10:15 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
So for example:
I'll start learning Perl 6 (select one or more that fits your opinion)
*) when Larry Wall declares that Perl 6.0 is ready
*) after Rakudo 1.0 is released
Given
12 matches
Mail list logo
