I am not too clear on how pack works in perl5.
Is there a work around in perl6 to achieve the same result, viz., not
using pack?
Richard
On 02/14/2011 02:41 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Richard (>):
I came across the idiom
print "P4\n$w $h\n";
for my $y (0..$h-1) {
print pack 'B*', pack 'C*',
Richard (>):
> I came across the idiom
>
> print "P4\n$w $h\n";
> for my $y (0..$h-1) {
> print pack 'B*', pack 'C*', map dot($_, $y), 0..$w-1;
> }
>
> in a perl5 program for outputting dots in a graphical format. dot() produces
> a 0 or -1.
>
> I found the 'pack' function in perl6, but it does
On Sun, 2011-13-02 at 20:27 +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Before doing any more work on this benchmarking project, I was wondering
> if any one else thinks the effort is worth it.
Me. I hope to get started in a couple of weeks once my accounting is
done.
>
> Although it is early days, it
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Richard Hainsworth
wrote:
> Before doing any more work on this benchmarking project, I was wondering if
> any one else thinks the effort is worth it.
Assuming that perl6 here == rakudo on parrot, I and others on the
parrot dev team would definitely find these hel
Before doing any more work on this benchmarking project, I was wondering
if any one else thinks the effort is worth it.
Although it is early days, it seemed reasonable to start setting up a
framework for benchmarking perl6 algorithms against
implementations/releases and against other language
I came across the idiom
print "P4\n$w $h\n";
for my $y (0..$h-1) {
print pack 'B*', pack 'C*', map dot($_, $y), 0..$w-1;
}
in a perl5 program for outputting dots in a graphical format. dot()
produces a 0 or -1.
I found the 'pack' function in perl6, but it does not seem to work the same.
