2010/11/6 Tadeusz Sośnierz :
> As I accidentally volunteered for managing a list of topics and writers
> for this year's Advent Calendar [1], I started to collect some ideas of
> things it'd be nice to write about. There's a gist [2] with the list of
> things from the top of my head. If you have an
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 6:21 PM, R. Dresens wrote:
> Yes, but aren't captures somehow replacements for references in
> general... and therefore also array references? The reason why I
> assume that is that I (wrongly?) expected a "real" 'Array()' when I
> used the `\` prefix in an expression such
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:30 PM, R. Dresens wrote:
> And what about this?...
>
> my $x = [3, 4]; my @y = 1, 2, |$x, 5, 6; say @y.perl;
>
> ...I actually expected `[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]`, since I was under the
> impression that the '|' was some kind of "flatten" or
> "interpolation" operator.
>
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:47:37AM +0100, Smylers wrote:
>
> On the other hand, many of our other list-y methods also work on
> scalars (treating them as a list of 1 element -- essentially a no-op):
> .join, .sort, .any, .all, .rotate, .
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Minimiscience wrote:
>
> This is just a wild, uneducated, possibly delusional guess, but I don't
> think that vertical bar before the '/>' should be there. I think it might
> be causing the grammar engine to check whether it can omit the ending of
> each tag and att
>
> Then why is it that .get works fine for $*IN?
>
> while $*IN.get -> $line {
> say $line
> }
>
Because you're using a while loop instead of a for loop ;-)
Leon
I can't help wondering "why does pid_file_handler need to be split up
in the first place?" Why wouldn't it be possible to simply call
pid_file_handler after become_daemon?
Regards,
Leon Timmermans
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> In t
This is a list for users of the Perl 6 programming language. You're in
the wrong place.
I'd guess you should ask at the gentoo-perl mailing list.
Regards,
Leon Timmermans
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Ranguvar Foeseeker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
Actually, I used them a few times. I agree the model used for html
generation is inadequate for most any serious usage. However, if you
need to dynamicaly generate forms CGI.pm is unmatched. A modernized
equavalent for them would still be very usefull IMHO. Though I agree
it might be better put in
