Thank you for the reply
functions like slurp, lines, words already depends on $*ARGFILES (which
> is awesome, i think) so i have no doubt there will be attention there.
>
Yes, that is a beautiful part of the specs. It is mimicking the
Perl5/awk/sed semantics, without the magic.
> > > nice ... b
Thanks you too
> $*ARGFILES is the correct FH to use when it comes to write unix filters
> (as it was in the other examples of the page).
>
Ok, I am 100% sure that, if people use it, eventually $*ARGFILES will
become as fast as $*IN. Because of people like Liz working on the project
> nice ...
Hi Liz,
bypassing $*ARGFILES.lines by using $*IN.lines, makes it faster for me than
using slurp, and seems like a more logic algorithm to solve the problem. I
think that, for any person that seriously thinks about using perl6 for
one-liners, using $*IN instead of $*ARGFILES is something to take int
say [+] $*IN.lines>>.Int
is quite faster.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:58 PM Marc Chantreux wrote:
> hello,
>
> question: in raku, is there a faster solution than
>
> say [+] lines
>
> long story;
>
> here is a thread i would like to reply to
>
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/450799/shel
w(params => (
Other parameters before
Parameter.new(
type => Callable,
sub-signature => &callback.signature),
... Other parameters after
), returns => int32);
}
... like pera-int-f after
}
From: Vittore Sco
Hello,
Thanks to the amazing job Lizmat did to implement runtime signatures it can be
done. You could also probably add some caching of the signatures and the
functions. I didn’t benchmark. Here the code:
use NativeCall;
sub pera-int-f(Str $format, *@args) {
state $ptr = cglob
Hi,
whenever I want to have fun, and I need to parse a non-trivial file format,
dealing with the output of special purpose software performing analysis on
experimental data, I choose Perl 6 due to the fact that composability makes
grammars very readable and logical-looking. On the other end, I sti
To simplify, it is my understanding that the "Apocalypse 6: Subroutines"
document define that as a subroutine declaration, with signature. Forgetting
the nomenclature, that might well be inspired by magical imaginary, AFAIK, it
is practically just pattern matching, same as a regex: to teach the
I answer myself: with % you get an Hash
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Vittore Scolari
wrote:
> Wouldn't here be better to use the % sigil?
>
> my %docents = bag @rows.map: -> @row {@row[0] xx @row[1]};
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Fernando Santagata
Wouldn't here be better to use the % sigil?
my %docents = bag @rows.map: -> @row {@row[0] xx @row[1]};
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Fernando Santagata <
nando.santag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure that I've understood what you need.
> If you get that array of arrays from a anoth
(interrupt 0)
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Vittore Scolari wrote:
> not what you think:
>
> module operator in % in perl6 is defined as $b - $a * floor($b / $a)
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Sean McAfee wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Darren Dunca
not what you think:
module operator in % in perl6 is defined as $b - $a * floor($b / $a)
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Sean McAfee wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Darren Duncan
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-12-11 12:22 PM, Sean McAfee wrote:
>>
>>> Well, not really. I don't think x %%
I think that this stems from a confusion between the divisibility problem
in integer number (on a ring) and the divisibility problem resolved by the
perl6 %% operator.
Personally I think that %% is useless while the former is useful and
missing. But I have nothing against useless operators
On Mon
13 matches
Mail list logo
