On 10/7/18 1:25 AM, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
Hi All,
I am going to possibly be writing binary code to my terminal.
This can really screw up your terminal. THe solution is
to enter
sane^j
on your keyboard. The ^ above is holding down your key.
I would like to be able to
Hi All,
I am going to possibly be writing binary code to my terminal.
This can really screw up your terminal. THe solution is
to enter
sane^j
on your keyboard. The ^ above is holding down your key.
I would like to be able to send that code at the end of the binary
print, just in case
Thank you!
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>
> > On 29 May 2017, at 17:33, Fernando Santagata
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Brent Laabs wrote:
> > > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22, Fernando Santagata <
> nando.santag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > /
> On 29 May 2017, at 17:33, Fernando Santagata
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Brent Laabs wrote:
> > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22, Fernando Santagata
> > wrote:
> >
> > /me sighs: NQP is still so poorly documented!
>
> Believe it or not, this is documented in nqp/docs/ops.markdo
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Brent Laabs wrote:
> > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22, Fernando Santagata
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > /me sighs: NQP is still so poorly documented!
>>
>
> Believe it or not, this is documented in nqp/docs/ops.markdown in the
> section under stat.
>
That is not under https://
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> Perhaps Zoffix is willing to take a PR for an IO::Path.nlinks method as
> part of the IO grant.
>
>
I think I'd rather have IO::Path.inode myself. Although, I did roll my own
version in IO::Path::More.
> > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22,
Perhaps Zoffix is willing to take a PR for an IO::Path.nlinks method as part of
the IO grant.
> On 29 May 2017, at 11:22, Fernando Santagata
> wrote:
>
> /me sighs: NQP is still so poorly documented!
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Brent Laabs wrote:
> This works without a module on Ra
/me sighs: NQP is still so poorly documented!
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Brent Laabs wrote:
> This works without a module on Rakudo:
>
> use nqp;
> my $path = "foo".IO;
> my $hardlink-count = nqp::stat($path.absolute, nqp::const::STAT_PLATFORM_
> NLINKS);
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 a
This works without a module on Rakudo:
use nqp;
my $path = "foo".IO;
my $hardlink-count = nqp::stat($path.absolute,
nqp::const::STAT_PLATFORM_NLINKS);
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> > On 29 May 2017, at 10:42, Fernando Santagata
> wrote:
> >
> > The three fil
> On 29 May 2017, at 10:42, Fernando Santagata
> wrote:
>
> The three files are already hard-linked, no need for soft links.
>
> BTW, is there a way to detect hard links in Perl6?
> Perl5 "stat" operator returns an array whose fourth element is the number of
> hard links of a file, but I don't
re required.
>
> On 5/28/17, Nelo Onyiah wrote:
> > I presume that's j for JVM and m for MoarVM.
> >
> > On 28 May 2017 2:42 pm, "Gabor Szabo" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've just noticed that in /Applications/Raku
If they are really identical, might it be an idea to use symbolic
links for 2 of them?
That would reduce the code to be stored, maintained, and transmitted,
and make it blatantly obvious if different versions are required.
On 5/28/17, Nelo Onyiah wrote:
> I presume that's j for JVM a
I presume that's j for JVM and m for MoarVM.
On 28 May 2017 2:42 pm, "Gabor Szabo" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just noticed that in /Applications/Rakudo/share/perl6/site/bin/ I
> have 3 copies
> of every script. One with a -j and one with a -m at the end just as
Hi,
I've just noticed that in /Applications/Rakudo/share/perl6/site/bin/ I
have 3 copies
of every script. One with a -j and one with a -m at the end just as for zef:
zef
zef-j
zef-m
The files seem to be identical.
Why are there 3 and what is their purpose?
Gabor
14 matches
Mail list logo
