Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-05 Thread Brad Gilbert
There isn't currently a way to compile to a single file, but there was a GSOC project that started on it. On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, 7:17 AM Aureliano Guedes wrote: > I have another question for you. Maybe it must be better done in another > thread... > But, there is a way to compile Raku code in a

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-05 Thread Aureliano Guedes
I have another question for you. Maybe it must be better done in another thread... But, there is a way to compile Raku code in a binary capable to run in a system without a Raku installation? On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:17 AM Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > Well, internally many parts still have Perl

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-05 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
Well, internally many parts still have Perl 6 in them. Renaming those is... an interesting task. Online, most resources have been renamed, but some still need to be done. This mailing list being one of them. Unfortunately, it is part of the crumbling Perl infrastructure, so it's unclear

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-05 Thread Wyatt Chun
Hi Is perl6 totall renamed to raku? regards On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 4:15 AM Fields, Christopher J wrote: > A few people had started a port of some BioPerl code to Perl6 a while ago; > I tested this recently and it still passed tests. > > https://github.com/cjfields/bioperl6 > > It should be

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-03 Thread Fields, Christopher J
A few people had started a port of some BioPerl code to Perl6 a while ago; I tested this recently and it still passed tests. https://github.com/cjfields/bioperl6 It should be renamed to bioraku! Chris Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2020, at 11:41 AM, Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-03 Thread Parrot Raiser
> we use ruby for Biological data analysis. I wish perl6 should have got that > capability. Would you like to give us a sample problem,, to see if someone can show a potential solution?

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-01 Thread Kristopher
on 2020/3/2 9:15, Parrot Raiser wrote: If the reference to "BIO" was about bioinformatics, the ability to use Perl 5 code and modules should reduce the amount of necessary re-working, though there are probably opportunities to rework the Perl 5 for more power and coherence in Rakudo. Thanks

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-01 Thread Kristopher
on 2020/2/29 17:16, Shlomi Fish wrote: do you meanhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioinformatics ? Yes, that's right. thank you.

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-03-01 Thread Parrot Raiser
Since Ruby was designed to fix what Matz considered mis-features of Perl 5, and the motivation for Rakudo was much the same, it's hardly surprising they're similar. One feature of any Open Source product to consider when investing any effort in it is the supporting community. Though Ruby was

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-02-29 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Kristopher, welcome aboard. On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 15:14:15 +0800 Kristopher wrote: > Hello, > > This is Kristopher from Japan. > We have ruby language, which I have been using on work for years. > Now I take a rough watch on perl6 language. > Can you tell me what are the main difference

Re: perl6 vs ruby

2020-02-29 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
https://docs.raku.org/language/rb-nutshell > On 29 Feb 2020, at 08:14, Kristopher wrote: > > Hello, > > This is Kristopher from Japan. > We have ruby language, which I have been using on work for years. > Now I take a rough watch on perl6 language. > Can you tell me what are the main

perl6 vs ruby

2020-02-28 Thread Kristopher
Hello, This is Kristopher from Japan. We have ruby language, which I have been using on work for years. Now I take a rough watch on perl6 language. Can you tell me what are the main difference between perl6 and ruby? Is perl6 good at BIO? Thank you.