Re: qx{} or backtick?

2008-06-19 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:45:24AM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote: : Hi, : : If system() is now called run() : : What replaces backtick or qx{} ? qqx[] or qq:x[] would be the exact equivalent. qx[] or q:x[] would be the same with single-quote semantics. (There are probably no backticks

Re: qx{} or backtick?

2008-06-19 Thread Gaal Yahas
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What replaces backtick or qx{} ? q:x{}, alternatively spelled qqx{}. From S02: Note that qx// doesn't interpolate. [...] If you want to abbreviate further, just define a macro: macro qx { 'qq:x

Re: qx{} or backtick?

2008-06-19 Thread Gaal Yahas
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Gaal Yahas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Gabor Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What replaces backtick or qx{} ? q:x{}, alternatively spelled qqx{}. From S02: qq:x, that is of course. -- Gaal Yahas [EMAIL PROTECTED] http