On 10/06/2017 03:06 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:53 PM, ToddAndMargo > wrote:
I would like to write a backup program to backup up
my wife's files.
Question: how do I access mtp://[usb:002,010] from
Dear List,
Krusader 2.5.0
Thunar 1.6.11
Scientific Linux 7.4
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70
http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/libmtp-rhel-7.5/libmtp-1.1.13-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
reference bug in RHEL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356288
Krusader will not recognize my wife's tablet. But Thunar
On 10/06/2017 03:22 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:13 PM, ToddAndMargo > wrote:
The weird part is that Thunar sees and operates the thing perfectly!
Thunar has a lot fewer moving parts and uses libmtp directly.
On 10/06/2017 02:53 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Dear List,
Krusader 2.5.0
Thunar 1.6.11
Scientific Linux 7.4
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70
http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/libmtp-rhel-7.5/libmtp-1.1.13-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
reference bug in RHEL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356288
Krusader
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 6:13 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> The weird part is that Thunar sees and operates the thing perfectly!
>
Thunar has a lot fewer moving parts and uses libmtp directly. Krusader
likely relies on a lot of extra KDE IPC goop implementing a virtual
On 10/05/2017 09:44 AM, Andy Bach wrote:
> is
<<>>
> synonymous with
qw[]
?
IIUC - close, it like qqw:
https://docs.perl6.org/language/quoting#index-entry-quote_qqww-quote_<<_>>-quote_«_»-Word_quoting_with_interpolation_and_quote_protection:_qqww
It's actually synonymous w/ qqww but
On 10/05/2017 02:50 PM, Brad Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Andy Bach wrote:
is
<<>>
synonymous with
qw[]
?
`<<>>` is the same as `qqww<<>>`
Which is short for `Q :qq :ww <<>>`
the `:qq` is short for `:double`, that is it turns on double quote