Richard Hainsworth rich...@rusrating.ru writes:
The number of modules available to proto has grown considerably.
I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
description about each module, other than just the name?
Just an opinion: imho every effort should go towards
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:27, Steffen Schwigon s...@renormalist.net wrote:
Just an opinion: imho every effort should go towards integrating CPAN
in any way.
Perl without CPAN feels like Kung-Fu on stack-heel shoe.
Maybe any of those META2.0, cpanminus, CPAN::Packager,
CPAN::Dpendency,
On 07/30/2010 01:27 PM, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
Richard Hainsworthrich...@rusrating.ru writes:
The number of modules available to proto has grown considerably.
I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
description about each module, other than just the name?
On Fri, 2010-30-07 at 16:08 +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
All I am suggesting is that the directories containing modules also
contain a METADATA file with some standard items, and that this
metadata
is required for a module that is registered. Even if there is a CPAN
system, the
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 04:08:49PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
On 07/30/2010 01:27 PM, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
Richard Hainsworthrich...@rusrating.ru writes:
I am not aware that there is a convenient way of obtaining a short
description about each module, other than just the name?
