Re: $epsilon = 1.0e-6 feels too big for Rat()

2015-12-31 Thread Darren Duncan
Considering that a non-fat Rat has a 64-bit denominator, I would expect 
conversions from Num to make use of that full precision by default, and not 
round off to 6 decimal places. -- Darren Duncan




Re: $epsilon = 1.0e-6 feels too big for Rat()

2015-12-31 Thread James Ellis Osborne III
Considering that the Chinese 5th Century is 1849, I would expect
http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015046627348 to present
less zuo.

-jas

On 31 December 2015 at 03:48, Darren Duncan  wrote:
> Considering that a non-fat Rat has a 64-bit denominator, I would expect
> conversions from Num to make use of that full precision by default, and not
> round off to 6 decimal places. -- Darren Duncan
>