Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-03-09 Thread Timo Paulssen
On 09/03/17 08:29, ToddAndMargo wrote: > https://atom.io/ > > as it is specifically written for Perl 6 Not quite. It's a general-purpose code editor that you could say comes from the javascript corner of programming. However, we do have active devs improving the perl6-related plugins for atom

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-03-09 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:29 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > https://atom.io/ > > as it is specifically written for Perl 6 > I'm not sure about that...but I would prefer Emacs. Luca

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-03-09 Thread Andreas Mueller
how funny is that ?? =:-) (please watch the clip) but I think we need an editor written in perl6 - not in Java ;) -am On 08.03.17 23:29, ToddAndMargo wrote: > Hi All, > > The guys on the chat line told me to look at > > https://atom.io/ > > as it is specifically written fo

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-03-08 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, The guys on the chat line told me to look at https://atom.io/ as it is specifically written for Perl 6 I tested it under "ssh -X". Oh boy it is SSSLLLOOOWWW. But if you are not using it remotely, it looks like a really sweet program for Perl 6. You can even create projects. Ove

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-03-08 Thread Dominique Dumont
[ sorry, I'm late on my mails.. ] On Monday, 27 February 2017 18:23:19 CET Luca Ferrari wrote: > please note that at least in Ubuntu Padre is shipped as version 1 > while 1.01 is available. I'm afraidr that won't last. Due to the many bugs (debuggger test don't work with recent perl), and lack o

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-03-07 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 27 February 2017 18:23:19 CET Luca Ferrari wrote: > please note that at least in Ubuntu Padre is shipped as version 1 > while 1.01 is available. That won't last. Ubuntu ships Debian packages. Due to the many bugs (debuggger never worked), and lack of stability (random crashes), I've

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-27 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Brandon Allbery >> wrote: >> > Padre's maintained? I thought it died years ago. >> >> Seems to me it is one year old now: >>

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-27 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Brandon Allbery > wrote: > > Padre's maintained? I thought it died years ago. > > Seems to me it is one year old now: > . > I personally use spacemacs with pe

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-27 Thread Luca Ferrari
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > Padre's maintained? I thought it died years ago. > Seems to me it is one year old now: . I personally use spacemacs with perl6 mode and it does the job for me. Luca

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-24 Thread vijayvithal jahagirdar
my alternative is Vim with a bunch of plugins to support (all) the features quoted at http://padre.perlide.org/features/ If anyone is interested my .vimrc is available at https://github.com/jahagirdar/misc-scripts/blob/master/.vimrc On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 7:17 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > On 02/2

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-24 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 02/24/2017 05:47 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 02/24/2017 04:58 PM, yary wrote: I installed and used Padre a little bit last year. It showed promise and seems to have had quite a bit of activity in its day. As of now it works for basic editing in perl6 but it seemed a little rough, and as Brando

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-24 Thread yary
Not really, and since I am not doing anything major in perl6, I still fire up Padre in a while. In general emacs, but I never installed any perl6 mode for it, I just use "fundamental"

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-24 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 02/24/2017 04:58 PM, yary wrote: I installed and used Padre a little bit last year. It showed promise and seems to have had quite a bit of activity in its day. As of now it works for basic editing in perl6 but it seemed a little rough, and as Brandon noted it isn't maintained, fixes would be D

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-24 Thread yary
I installed and used Padre a little bit last year. It showed promise and seems to have had quite a bit of activity in its day. As of now it works for basic editing in perl6 but it seemed a little rough, and as Brandon noted it isn't maintained, fixes would be DIY.

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-24 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:45 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: > http://padre.perlide.org/ > > Any good for Perl 6? You have a better one you like? Padre's maintained? I thought it died years ago. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com

Re: Your thoughts on Padre?

2017-02-24 Thread Lloyd Fournier
I haven't heard much on Padre. I use emacs, which gets the job done for me. A fair bit of work has gone into making an atom mode that works. See: https://github.com/MadcapJake/language-perl6fe LL On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 9:46 AM ToddAndMargo wrote: http://padre.perlide.org/ Any good for Perl 6?