Re: Recognising libraries.

2010-12-11 Thread Brandon S Allbery KF8NH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/9/10 13:43 , yary wrote: > I see a pattern - the libs not found have a version number. They > should also be removed (along with the .so), let the linker determine > the version. How it will decide between 4.7 and 4.8 when you tell it > to load l

Re: Recognising libraries.

2010-12-10 Thread NotFound
> I see a pattern - the libs not found have a version number. They > should also be removed (along with the .so), let the linker determine > the version. How it will decide between 4.7 and 4.8 when you tell it > to load libdb is an exercise for someone else. I hate linkers. Some systems does not i

Re: Recognising libraries.

2010-12-09 Thread yary
I see a pattern - the libs not found have a version number. They should also be removed (along with the .so), let the linker determine the version. How it will decide between 4.7 and 4.8 when you tell it to load libdb is an exercise for someone else. I hate linkers. -y

Recognising libraries.

2010-12-09 Thread Richard Hainsworth
I was testing zavolaj (NativeCall) and discovered a library that I was certain was in /usr/lib was not being found. So I tried looking at all the libraries in and testing with the relevant line from NativeCall. The results (see below) are inconsistent, and I can find no pattern. I dont know