Mark Stosberg skribis 2006-09-16 21:32 (-0500):
> In theory, "use perl5:CGI" could be a fine solution. In practice, it
> hasn't worked out well for me.Even something that seems simple like
> passing a hashref to Perl 5 is not documented now.
I base my thoughts on Perl 6, not Pugs specifically. It'
Aankhen wrote:
>
> The major feeling was that there should be no CGI.pm (if someone was
> hellbent on using it, they could use the Perl 5 module).
In theory, "use perl5:CGI" could be a fine solution. In practice, it
hasn't worked out well for me. Even something that seems simple like
passing a h
Mark Stosberg skribis 2006-09-16 21:30 (-0500):
> Aankhen wrote:
> > The major feeling was that there should be no CGI.pm (if someone was
> > hellbent on using it, they could use the Perl 5 module).
> In theory, "use perl5:CGI" could be a fine solution. In practice, it
> hasn't worked out well fo
Aankhen wrote:
>
> The major feeling was that there should be no CGI.pm (if someone was
> hellbent on using it, they could use the Perl 5 module).
In theory, "use perl5:CGI" could be a fine solution. In practice, it
hasn't worked out well for me. Even something that seems simple like
passing a h
