Re: Behaviour of U+002F in IE and Mozilla

2004-08-18 Thread Hooman Mehr
The behavior was changed between Unicode 4.0 and 4.0.1! With the latest Unicode version, using Persian digits, in a Persian paragraph, something like 1361/07/05 will render 1361/07/05, not 05/07/1361, which is a good thing. (Using Arabic digits instead of Persian digits most probably result in

Re: Behaviour of U+002F in IE and Mozilla

2004-08-17 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Ali A. Khanban wrote: Hi, Since the Arabic thousand separator, U+066B, is not commonly in use, most of Persian sites use /, U+002F, instead. The behaviour, when it is used between numbers, is different in IE (and MS Office) and Mozilla. Which one is the correct one?

Behaviour of U+002F in IE and Mozilla

2004-08-12 Thread Ali A. Khanban
Hi, Since the Arabic thousand separator, U+066B, is not commonly in use, most of Persian sites use /, U+002F, instead. The behaviour, when it is used between numbers, is different in IE (and MS Office) and Mozilla. Which one is the correct one? Best -ali- --