Dear Behdad:
You replied to me personally, so allow me to forward your message (below) to
the list as your question was apparently directed to all list members.
The interesting thing with www.babylon.com/... is that some of these Persian
dictionaries carry a copyright message, while others,
To cite any dictionary in another dictionary, [you] better resolve
the copyright issue first.
Good point, but these issues are interdependent, aren't they? Most
dictionaries, as a matter of fact, are *collected citations* from (usually)
a variety of sources, no matter if they name their sources
Sure. These are raw data that I received from Iran on a diskette, and
converted into Unicode (plus some more editing work). As no copyright
message was given alongside with the original data, there was no reason to
assume that usage should infringe any third party's rights.
The release of these
As I looked at CSS3 module: Lists (W3C Working Draft 7 November 2002)
there will be an arabic-indic for changing the numeric system.
;)
/Beee
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-lists-20021107/#list-style-type
C Bobroff wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Behnam Esfahbod wrote:
In new mozilla release
Dear Friends
Please Search Farsification Project in google, then go to products, find
IUC (ITRC Unicode Coinvertor, It may help you.
Azadnia
Do you have the zarnegar's on disc format?
Is it published at all?
--mas
On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 02:23, Amin Mohadjer wrote:
Has anyone tried
Oops!
On CSS3, list-style-type value can be:
arabic-indic: for ARABIC-INDIC DIGITs
farsi, urdu: for EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGITs
Regards,
/Beee
Behnam Esfahbod wrote:
As I looked at CSS3 module: Lists (W3C Working Draft 7 November 2002)
there will be an arabic-indic for changing the numeric
