Re: leap year issue with jalali

2005-03-27 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > No, I don't. But the best is trying to get someone fix the bug from the > C source and recompile. There are many Windows users out there. > > roozbeh I'll go a remove. If anybody cares, somebody would send along. Ehsan? --behdad http://behdad.org/

Re: leap year issue with jalali

2005-03-27 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 02:34 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > I don't know why Roozbeh > likes to keep he buggy executable around. No specific reason. Probably waiting for someone to submit a fixed version of the Windows binary. > Roozbeh, do you mind if I remove it? No, I don't. But the best is t

Re: leap year issue with jalali

2005-03-25 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
What do you mean "I also checked"? I think you "just checked" the jalali.exe. This is an old bug that have been fixed in C source, PHP source, PalmOS, etc, but I don't know why Roozbeh likes to keep he buggy executable around. Roozbeh, do you mind if I remove it? behdad On Sat, 26 Mar 2005,