If PETSc has symbols greater than 6 characters, it has never been Fortran 77
compliant anyways, so it's a bit strange to ask permission to break it in
another way in the examples.
Sorry for being a pedant but we've had this debate in the MPI Forum and it is
false to conflate punchcard Fortran
Hi,
wanting to prevent a possible error: I compile and link (dynamically) my
code with petsc-3.7.2 BUT I may change my LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to
3.7.0...
I would the like my code to stop and tell me I am using the wrong libs...
I could add something like:
if (PETSC_VERSION_MAJOR !=
Just an update for the list, Steve seems to have narrowed it down to a
compiler bug in the array assignment as Matt suggested.
Mark
Quick update: just checking ierr isn’t enough to avoid the compiler bug,
but adding zero to n1 is.
Compiling the code as sent:
145, Loop not fused: function
