> On 6 Jun 2017, at 11:21 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 6, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Pierre Jolivet
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:44:06 -0500, Hong wrote:
>>> Pierre :
>>>
Yes, of course I defined (*C)->ops->matmultnumeric =
MatMatMultNumeric_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense in
MatMa
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:23 PM Barry Smith wrote:
>
> > On Jun 6, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> >
> > Matthew Knepley writes:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> Matthew Knepley writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc
>>> user base?
>>>
>>> I was thinking about these metrics:
>>> * av
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Pierre Jolivet wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:44:06 -0500, Hong wrote:
>> Pierre :
>>
>>> Yes, of course I defined (*C)->ops->matmultnumeric =
>>> MatMatMultNumeric_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense in
>>> MatMatMultSymbolic_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense.
>>> However, the routine MatMatMultSy
What is your calling procedure for using MatMatMultNumeric_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense?
Hong
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Pierre Jolivet
wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:44:06 -0500, Hong wrote:
>
>> Pierre :
>>
>> Yes, of course I defined (*C)->ops->matmultnumeric =
>>> MatMatMultNumeric_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:44:06 -0500, Hong wrote:
Pierre :
Yes, of course I defined (*C)->ops->matmultnumeric =
MatMatMultNumeric_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense in
MatMatMultSymbolic_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense.
However, the routine MatMatMultSymbolic_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense is never
reached when calling MatMatMult with scall ==
Pierre :
>
>
> Yes, of course I defined (*C)->ops->matmultnumeric =
> MatMatMultNumeric_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense in MatMatMultSymbolic_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense.
> However, the routine MatMatMultSymbolic_MPIBAIJ_MPIDense is never reached
> when calling MatMatMult with scall == MAT_REUSE_MATRIX (
> http://www.mcs.an
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> Matthew Knepley writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc
> >> user base?
> >>
> >> I was thinking about these metrics:
> >
Matthew Knepley writes:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc
>> user base?
>>
>> I was thinking about these metrics:
>> * average monthly downloads
>>
>
> This has email statistics: https://arx
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:57:10 -0500, Hong wrote:
Pierre:
Hello,
I'm implementing MatMatMult for A of type MPIBAIJ, B and C of type
MPIDENSE.
1) I copied around some code for the case where A is of type
MPIAIJ. Any reason why communications and computations are not
overlapped in the MatMatMult imp
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc
> user base?
>
> I was thinking about these metrics:
> * average monthly downloads
>
This has email statistics: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.01122
Its very hard to g
Pierre:
> Hello,
> I'm implementing MatMatMult for A of type MPIBAIJ, B and C of type
> MPIDENSE.
> 1) I copied around some code for the case where A is of type MPIAIJ. Any
> reason why communications and computations are not overlapped in the
> MatMatMult implementation? http://www.mcs.anl.gov/pe
Hello,
I'm implementing MatMatMult for A of type MPIBAIJ, B and C of type
MPIDENSE.
1) I copied around some code for the case where A is of type MPIAIJ.
Any reason why communications and computations are not overlapped in the
MatMatMult implementation?
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-curren
Hello,
Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc
user base?
I was thinking about these metrics:
* average monthly downloads
* total citations (looks like 1518 from google scholar)
* any estimates of the number of actual users
Any other metrics would be welcome as we
14 matches
Mail list logo