Re: [petsc-dev] composite vs. shell

"Smith, Barry F." writes: > Jed, > > Please articulate in a bit more detail. From what I can interpolate you > are saying > > 1) that if we only propagate the outer matrices to inner matrices that the > user has not set we will get a better more intuitive interface

Re: [petsc-dev] proposed minor PetscPartitioner changes

> On Nov 8, 2017, at 3:52 AM, Vaclav Hapla wrote: > > >> 8. 11. 2017 v 9:06, Lisandro Dalcin : >> >> On 8 November 2017 at 05:51, Smith, Barry F. wrote: >>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 1:33 AM, Lisandro Dalcin

Re: [petsc-dev] composite vs. shell

Jed, Please articulate in a bit more detail. From what I can interpolate you are saying 1) that if we only propagate the outer matrices to inner matrices that the user has not set we will get a better more intuitive interface for users but 2) the whole idea of propagating in is

Re: [petsc-dev] DMPlexCreateMedFromFile broken

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Vaclav Hapla wrote: > > 7. 11. 2017 v 19:51, Matthew Knepley : > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Vaclav Hapla > wrote: > >> Nico Schlömer just introduced MED support into his meshio

Re: [petsc-dev] DMPlexCreateMedFromFile broken

7. 11. 2017 v 19:51, Matthew Knepley :On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Vaclav Hapla  wrote:Nico Schlömer just introduced MED support into his meshio tool, based on my issue request. When I convert blockcylinder-50.exo directly to the MED format with

Re: [petsc-dev] proposed minor PetscPartitioner changes

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Vaclav Hapla wrote: > Thanks for the discussion. I think we got further. > > 8. 11. 2017 v 20:42, Matthew Knepley : > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > >> Matthew Knepley

Re: [petsc-dev] proposed minor PetscPartitioner changes

Thanks for the discussion. I think we got further. > 8. 11. 2017 v 20:42, Matthew Knepley : > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Jed Brown > wrote: > Matthew Knepley > writes: > > > On