> On Jun 24, 2022, at 1:38 PM, Mark Adams wrote:
>
> I am rearranging the code for clarity from the repo but I have:
>
> PetscBool is_dev_ptrs;
> PetscCall(MatMPIAIJGetLocalMat(Pmat, MAT_INITIAL_MATRIX, &amgx->localA));
> PetscCall(PetscObjectTypeCompareAny((PetscObject)amgx->localA,
>
I am rearranging the code for clarity from the repo but I have:
PetscBool is_dev_ptrs;
PetscCall(MatMPIAIJGetLocalMat(Pmat, MAT_INITIAL_MATRIX, &amgx->localA));
PetscCall(PetscObjectTypeCompareAny((PetscObject)amgx->localA,
&is_dev_ptrs, MATAIJCUSPARSE, MATSEQAIJCUSPARSE, MATMPIAIJCUSPARSE,
> On Jun 24, 2022, at 8:58 AM, Mark Adams wrote:
>
> And before we move to the MR, I think Matt found a clear problem:
>
> * PetscCall(MatMPIAIJGetLocalMat(Pmat, MAT_REUSE_MATRIX, &amgx->localA));
> returns "localA seqaij"
>
> * And, oddly, PetscCall(MatSeqAIJGetArrayRead(amgx->localA, &amgx-
And before we move to the MR, I think Matt found a clear problem:
* PetscCall(MatMPIAIJGetLocalMat(Pmat, MAT_REUSE_MATRIX, &amgx->localA));
returns "localA seqaij"
* And, oddly, PetscCall(MatSeqAIJGetArrayRead(amgx->localA,
&amgx->values)); returns:
"it seems to detect that the pointer is a devic
I am not seeing this response, I see my "hstack" comment last.
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/4323
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 4:37 PM Barry Smith wrote:
>
> I have responded in the MR, which has all the context and the code.
> Please move this conversation from petsc-dev to the MR
