(which once TP'ed my house).
Matt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Barry Smith bsm...@mcs.anl.gov
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)
To: Stefan Benkler benkler at itis.ethz.ch
Cc: petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov
Stefan
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Matthew Knepley wrote:
I for one think it should be possible to remove 'make' from the
toolchain, leaving us with only win32fe, which we distribute. Thus
I think we could abandon cygwin once and for all. I would even be
willing to write a \emph{make clone} to accomplish
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Satish Balay balay at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Matthew Knepley wrote:
I for one think it should be possible to remove 'make' from the
toolchain, leaving us with only win32fe, which we distribute. Thus
I think we could abandon cygwin once and
:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)
To: Stefan Benkler benkler at itis.ethz.ch
Cc: petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov
Stefan,
Here is my understanding of the situation.
Conjecture: You CAN use an open source compiler (GNU) to compile
proprietary code
this, even though
I am a committed enemy of make (which once TP'ed my house).
Matt
-- Forwarded message --
From: Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)
To: Stefan Benkler
--
From: Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)
To: Stefan Benkler benkler at itis.ethz.ch
Cc: petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov
Stefan,
Here is my understanding of the situation
at gmail.com wrote:
From: Lisandro Dalcin dalcinl at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)
To: petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov
Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008, 10:28 PM
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Make
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Farshid Mossaiby wrote:
Hi all,
I am really glad to hear this. This is exactly what I wished, and told you
some time ago.
Just wanted you to know that there is a Windows Services For Unix
(SFU) add-on for Windows, which is in some way like Cygwin. It is
free, and
On Thu 2008-12-04 16:58, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Make is NOT the problem! (It is just one of several)
Indeed. However, at some time I'll try to make PETSc build with Scons.
Presumably you have some experience with
: Re: [PETSC #18705] PETSc and Cygwin License (POSIX layer)
To: petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov
Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 12:21 AM
On Thu 2008-12-04 16:58, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov wrote:
Make is NOT the problem! (It is just
10 matches
Mail list logo
