On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>MatCreateMPIAIJ(), MatCreateMPIBAIJ(), MatCreateMPISBAIJ() actually
> create Seq version of the matrices when run on one process.
>
>Meanwhile MatMPIXXXSetPreallocation() alw
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:39, Barry Smith wrote:
> I just want it removed from the XAIJ preallocation one, not the
> individual preallocation ones, leave that them in that one.
http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/6a8a730dd0af
-- next part --
An HTML attachment w
On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:31, Barry Smith wrote:
> Cool. Some suggestions for this routine:
>
> 1) get rid of the maximum number of non-zeros per row arguments, they are
> stupid and just make this calling sequence too damn complicated looking
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:31, Barry Smith wrote:
> Cool. Some suggestions for this routine:
>
> 1) get rid of the maximum number of non-zeros per row arguments, they are
> stupid and just make this calling sequence too damn complicated looking.
>
Okay, I thought I would help people out who wa
On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>MatCreateMPIAIJ(), MatCreateMPIBAIJ(), MatCreateMPISBAIJ() actually
> create Seq version of the matrices when run on one process.
>
>Meanwhile MatMPIXXXSetPreallocation() alw
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>MatCreateMPIAIJ(), MatCreateMPIBAIJ(), MatCreateMPISBAIJ() actually
> create Seq version of the matrices when run on one process.
>
>Meanwhile MatMPIXXXSetPreallocation() always do preallocation for MPI
> case.
>
>Shouldn't MatC
MatCreateMPIAIJ(), MatCreateMPIBAIJ(), MatCreateMPISBAIJ() actually
create Seq version of the matrices when run on one process.
Meanwhile MatMPIXXXSetPreallocation() always do preallocation for MPI case.
Shouldn't MatCreateMPIXXX() be MatCreateXXX()?
Also should we add MatXX
