There is no way to do do it consistently for all contributors, it would be a
big mess plus it would miss all the history.
If NVIDIA requires it to contribute then I see no harm in having those two
lines in certain source files. It is not tracking provenance in any way, it is
just a way
> > 2) NVIDIA's lawyers have some thoughts that we will need to address
When I saw this is, my thought was: ANL lawyers would be involved here [as
generally employees couldn't respond to legal stuff]
> git grep Copyright locates some files that are copyrighted by other groups
> (but fit
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021, at 7:16 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> * We should also add some text to LICENSE indicating certain files have
> additional copyrights indicated at the top of the individual file.*
> **
Copyright is held by hundreds of individuals and organizations. I'm not a fan
of having
git grep Copyright locates some files that are copyrighted by other groups
(but fit within the BSD license) so I think it is fine to include the NVIDIA
copyright information in appropriate files.
We should also add some text to LICENSE indicating certain files have
additional copyrights
All,
Matthew (cc'ed) and I are going to start working on an AMGx interface in
PETSc, PCAMGX, and I suggested that he may want to think about moving the
core AMG PC code into PETSC as a built-in PC.
1) We would have to decide of we want the maintenance burden of moving the
whole thing in, but we
