Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Jed Brown
Sean Farley writes: > Jed Brown writes: > >> Sean Farley writes: >> >>> Jed Brown writes: >>> Sean Farley writes: > Sean Farley writes: > >> Andrew McRae writes: >> >>> But we clone from our fork (formerly Bitbucket firedrake/petsc, now >>> Github >>>

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Sean Farley
Jed Brown writes: > Sean Farley writes: > >> Jed Brown writes: >> >>> Sean Farley writes: >>> Sean Farley writes: > Andrew McRae writes: > >> But we clone from our fork (formerly Bitbucket firedrake/petsc, now >> Github >> firedrakeproject/petsc), not from Bitb

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Jed Brown
Sean Farley writes: > Jed Brown writes: > >> Sean Farley writes: >> >>> Sean Farley writes: >>> Andrew McRae writes: > But we clone from our fork (formerly Bitbucket firedrake/petsc, now Github > firedrakeproject/petsc), not from Bitbucket petsc/petsc. Yeah, the st

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Jed Brown
Sean Farley writes: > Sean Farley writes: > >> Andrew McRae writes: >> >>> But we clone from our fork (formerly Bitbucket firedrake/petsc, now Github >>> firedrakeproject/petsc), not from Bitbucket petsc/petsc. >> >> Yeah, the stats won't be perfect, of course. Hopefully, useful enough >> for s

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Sean Farley
Sean Farley writes: > Andrew McRae writes: > >> But we clone from our fork (formerly Bitbucket firedrake/petsc, now Github >> firedrakeproject/petsc), not from Bitbucket petsc/petsc. > > Yeah, the stats won't be perfect, of course. Hopefully, useful enough > for some general idea of the numbers.

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Sean Farley
Andrew McRae writes: > But we clone from our fork (formerly Bitbucket firedrake/petsc, now Github > firedrakeproject/petsc), not from Bitbucket petsc/petsc. Yeah, the stats won't be perfect, of course. Hopefully, useful enough for some general idea of the numbers. signature.asc Description: PG

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Sean Farley
Sean Farley writes: > Barry Smith writes: > >>Sean, >> >> Very cool maps. Thanks for the b-day present > > :-D > >> It is strange that there are many archive downloads from the US and >> none from elsewhere. Maybe there is some single weird client (spack?) doing >> these downloa

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Andrew McRae
But we clone from our fork (formerly Bitbucket firedrake/petsc, now Github firedrakeproject/petsc), not from Bitbucket petsc/petsc. On 8 June 2017 at 22:37, Lawrence Mitchell wrote: > > > > On 8 Jun 2017, at 21:48, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > It is strange that there are many archive downloa

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Lawrence Mitchell
> On 8 Jun 2017, at 21:48, Barry Smith wrote: > > It is strange that there are many archive downloads from the US and none > from elsewhere. Maybe there is some single weird client (spack?) doing these > downloads? Can you get exact details on who/where the requests came from? > > A

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Sean Farley
Barry Smith writes: >Sean, > > Very cool maps. Thanks for the b-day present :-D > It is strange that there are many archive downloads from the US and none > from elsewhere. Maybe there is some single weird client (spack?) doing these > downloads? Can you get exact details on wh

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-08 Thread Barry Smith
Sean, Very cool maps. Thanks for the b-day present It is strange that there are many archive downloads from the US and none from elsewhere. Maybe there is some single weird client (spack?) doing these downloads? Can you get exact details on who/where the requests came from?

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-06 Thread Jeff Hammond
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:23 PM Barry Smith wrote: > > > On Jun 6, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > > > Matthew Knepley writes: > > > >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May > wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-06 Thread Barry Smith
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > Matthew Knepley writes: > >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc >>> user base? >>> >>> I was thinking about these metrics: >>> * av

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-06 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > Matthew Knepley writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May > wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc > >> user base? > >> > >> I was thinking about these metrics: > >

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-06 Thread Jed Brown
Matthew Knepley writes: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc >> user base? >> >> I was thinking about these metrics: >> * average monthly downloads >> > > This has email statistics: https://arx

Re: [petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-06 Thread Matthew Knepley
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Dave May wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc > user base? > > I was thinking about these metrics: > * average monthly downloads > This has email statistics: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.01122 Its very hard to g

[petsc-dev] PETSc statistics

2017-06-06 Thread Dave May
Hello, Is there a place where I can find up-to-date statistics about the PETSc user base? I was thinking about these metrics: * average monthly downloads * total citations (looks like 1518 from google scholar) * any estimates of the number of actual users Any other metrics would be welcome as we