On 5 August 2010 18:07, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>
>> On 5 August 2010 13:40, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
>> > What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on an empty
>> > handle:
>> > PetscDLSym(handle=PETSC_NULL, symbol, &value)
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 5 August 2010 18:07, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Lisandro Dalcin
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5 August 2010 13:40, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
> >> > What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on
On 5 August 2010 13:40, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
> What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on an empty handle:
> PetscDLSym(handle=PETSC_NULL, symbol, &value)
> My understanding was that this should look for symbol in the symbol table of
> the main executable.
> This is based on what
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> On 5 August 2010 13:40, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
> > What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on an empty
> handle:
> > PetscDLSym(handle=PETSC_NULL, symbol, &value)
> > My understanding was that this should look for symbol in
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Dmitry Karpeev >> mcs.anl.gov>wrote:
>>>
What is the intended behavior of Pets
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Dmitry Karpeev > mcs.anl.gov>wrote:
>>
>>> What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on an empty
>>> handle: PetscDLSym(handle=PETSC
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
>
>> What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on an empty
>> handle: PetscDLSym(handle=PETSC_NULL, symbol, &value)
>> My understanding was that this should look for symb
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Dmitry Karpeev wrote:
> What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on an empty handle:
> PetscDLSym(handle=PETSC_NULL, symbol, &value)
> My understanding was that this should look for symbol in the symbol table
> of the main executable.
> This is base
What is the intended behavior of PetscDLSym when called on an empty handle:
PetscDLSym(handle=PETSC_NULL, symbol, &value)
My understanding was that this should look for symbol in the symbol table of
the main executable.
This is based on what happens in the Windows case (#ifdef
PETSC_HAVE_WINDOWS_H)