At least on my machine, this does not work correctly
testset:
nsize: {{1 2 4}}
args: -use_generator -faces {{2,2,2 1,3,5 3,4,7}}
args: -interpolate -distribute -interpolate_after_distribute {{0 1}}
args: -dm_plex_check_pointsf
test:
#TODO some combinations generate
Hello all,
I am trying to solve a Stokes type problem using PETSc's Fieldsplit
infrastructure while providing external GMG information coming from libMesh
and am running into issues when using the two simultaneously.
I have verified that FS + MG behaves as expected on its own, (I can use
Thanks for the prompt reply and clarifications!
2) Could you be more specific about what should be different? It sounds
> like you want "your" DM attached to the (0,0) block so that
> you can do GMG on the Laplacian there.
>
Exactly. This works if I use pc_type gamg on the (0,0) block, but
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 2:48 PM Boris Boutkov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to solve a Stokes type problem using PETSc's Fieldsplit
> infrastructure while providing external GMG information coming from libMesh
> and am running into issues when using the two simultaneously.
>
> I have