I'll push shorty.
Thanks.
Dmitry.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Hong Zhang hong at aspiritech.org wrote:
Dmitry,
Petsc repo server is down due to bad hard disc.
We are replacing it with a new disc - hopefully to get it back as soon
as possible.
I get build error about Matfwk, and pushed
I can work within MATSCATTER, but the question is what is the
VecScatter returned by
MatScatterGetVecScatter applied to such a transposed MATSCATTER?
I guess it can be clarified in documentation that extracting this
scatter from B, which is
MATSCATTER and a transpose of another MATSCATTER A, then
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dima Karpeyev karp...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] MATSCATTER Transpose
To: petsc-dev at zimbra.anl.gov, For users of the development version of
PETSc petsc-dev at mcs.anl.gov
I can work within MATSCATTER
The way I've written MatFwk so far, it operates on nonoverlapping dof blocks,
but the idea is that we want to first scatter a Vec into an unrolled version,
duplicating the overlap dofs.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Jed Brown jed at 59a2.org wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:51:53 -0500, Barry
--with-mpi=0 is a command, which is mandatory, and --with-sizeofint=8
seems to specify an optional parameter.
To me '--with' suggests something optional, so I'd vote for keeping
'--with' to indicate
optional parameters and replace it with '--use' (an imperative) when
specifying mandatory commands.
Cython can accelerate almost any Python code nearly immediately
(although it supports a somewhat restricted subset of Python).
This is simply due to converting it to equivalent C code that is compiled
and runs within CPython.
Then, chunks of the Python code can be explicitly typed, which can
It is a preconditioner, rather than a matrix class, isn't it?
Dmitry.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com wrote:
That is Oliver's old code. It is really complicated. I believe even Oliver
thinks that any new implementation should start from scratch, using his
I have one comment: valgrind sounds like a very tool-specific option.
Are there other memory checking tools?
Maybe there should be an option like -memcheck [valgrind] with an optional
tool name,
similar to -start_in_debugger [gdb]?
Dmitry.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Barry Smith bsmith at
