On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:02 AM Junchao Zhang wrote:
> See this example, after multiple casts, the code directly accesses
> VecScatter_MPI_General's members, with an assumption that from->n is the
> total number of receive processors. When I separate intranode / internode
> communications, I
Matthew Knepley writes:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:02 AM Junchao Zhang wrote:
>
>> See this example, after multiple casts, the code directly accesses
>> VecScatter_MPI_General's members, with an assumption that from->n is the
>> total number of receive processors. When I separate intranode /
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 6:58 AM Jed Brown wrote:
> Matthew Knepley writes:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:02 AM Junchao Zhang
> wrote:
> >
> >> See this example, after multiple casts, the code directly accesses
> >> VecScatter_MPI_General's members, with an assumption that from->n is the
>
Jeff Hammond writes:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27778908/define-private-to-public-in-c/27779038#27779038
Of course, but my point stands: data hiding is only as strong as the
mores and norms of clients. Even if the private header is unavailable
to the client, offsets can be reversed
