On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:24 AM Jed Brown wrote:
> Matthew Knepley writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM Jed Brown wrote:
> >
> >> Matthew Knepley writes:
> >>
> >> > I am having a problem, and every solution I can think of would seem
> to do
> >> > violence to encapsulation or to
Matthew Knepley writes:
> I am having a problem, and every solution I can think of would seem to do
> violence to encapsulation or to DMKSP/DMSNES.
>
> I want to have GMG automatically work on the velocity part of Stokes. So I
> give
>
> -fieldsplit_velocity_pc_type mg
>
> in SNES ex62. This
Hi, I'm just wondering if this ties into the issues I brought up in :
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/2018-October/023615.html ?
>From my perspective, I think I would prefer the copy everything mechanism,
but I'm not sure about the nature of the introduced dependencies and if I
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM Jed Brown wrote:
> Matthew Knepley writes:
>
> > I am having a problem, and every solution I can think of would seem to do
> > violence to encapsulation or to DMKSP/DMSNES.
> >
> > I want to have GMG automatically work on the velocity part of Stokes. So
> I
> >
I am having a problem, and every solution I can think of would seem to do
violence to encapsulation or to DMKSP/DMSNES.
I want to have GMG automatically work on the velocity part of Stokes. So I
give
-fieldsplit_velocity_pc_type mg
in SNES ex62. This complains that the KSP has a DM but
Matthew Knepley writes:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM Jed Brown wrote:
>
>> Matthew Knepley writes:
>>
>> > I am having a problem, and every solution I can think of would seem to do
>> > violence to encapsulation or to DMKSP/DMSNES.
>> >
>> > I want to have GMG automatically work on the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:13 PM Jed Brown wrote:
> Matthew Knepley writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:24 AM Jed Brown wrote:
> >
> >> Matthew Knepley writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM Jed Brown wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Matthew Knepley writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > I am
Matthew Knepley writes:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:24 AM Jed Brown wrote:
>
>> Matthew Knepley writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:06 AM Jed Brown wrote:
>> >
>> >> Matthew Knepley writes:
>> >>
>> >> > I am having a problem, and every solution I can think of would seem
>> to do
>>
Dear PETSc folks,
after broad approval, the pull request for the Code of Conduct has been
merged to master and is now active.
Best regards,
Karli
On 10/23/18 12:52 PM, Karl Rupp wrote:
Dear PETSc folks,
I ask all members of the PETSc team to review the following proposal for
adopting a
