Pierre Barbier de Reuille pierre.barbierdereui...@gmail.com writes:
Ok, it seems if I set the domain error from the rhs function, it will
indeed fail and backtrack. I hope that is what was intended?
Yes, the PostStep (or PostStage) callbacks are not intended for this.
signature.asc
The reason it (superlu_dist) doesn't build is that it uses C99 compiler
features while Microsoft C compiler only supports C89. The line of code
int nlsupers = nsupers/Pc;
is not valid c89 since it declares a new variable after other code.
You can try to fix all the C99 uses in that
suggest sticking with
http://crd-legacy.lbl.gov/~xiaoye/SuperLU/superlu_dist_3.3.tar.gz [for
petsc-3.5]
Satish
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Barry Smith wrote:
The reason it (superlu_dist) doesn't build is that it uses C99 compiler
features while Microsoft C compiler only supports C89. The line
On 10 Feb 2015, at 01:31, Jed Brown j...@jedbrown.org wrote:
Lawrence Mitchell lawrence.mitch...@imperial.ac.uk writes:
Having just tried a build with --download-mpich, I notice this problem
does not occur. So should I shout at the OpenMPI team?
Open MPI has many long-standing bugs with
A quick google search shows some work at calculating the left and right
eigenvalues simultaneously back in 2005, however not much sooner has popped up.
Is this possible yet? Where can I find more information?
Thanks
-Andrew
Ok, it seems if I set the domain error from the rhs function, it will
indeed fail and backtrack. I hope that is what was intended?
I tried before to set it in the PostStep function, but I couldn't get the
current solution from there, SNESGetSolution returns an empty vector.
Cheers,
Pierre
On
Barry Smith bsm...@mcs.anl.gov writes:
The reason it (superlu_dist) doesn't build is that it uses C99 compiler
features while Microsoft C compiler only supports C89. The line of code
int nlsupers = nsupers/Pc;
is not valid c89 since it declares a new variable after other code.
Or
El 10/02/2015, a las 22:46, Andrew Spott escribió:
A quick google search shows some work at calculating the left and right
eigenvalues simultaneously back in 2005, however not much sooner has popped
up. Is this possible yet? Where can I find more information?
Thanks
-Andrew
It is
Thanks. I figured as much and just wanted to confirm it.
-Andrew
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Jose E. Roman jro...@dsic.upv.es wrote:
El 10/02/2015, a las 22:46, Andrew Spott escribió:
A quick google search shows some work at calculating the left and right
eigenvalues simultaneously
