On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Bikash Kanungo wrote:
> Hi Satish,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I will change make makefiles and try to make it
> work. However, I would like to state that the above problem appears only
> while linking to petsc-3.7.5. My code compiles well with petsc-3.6.3. The
>
Hi Satish,
Thanks for the suggestions. I will change make makefiles and try to make it
work. However, I would like to state that the above problem appears only
while linking to petsc-3.7.5. My code compiles well with petsc-3.6.3. The
configuration options were same for both petsc-3.7.5 and
Thanks for letting us know, I added some additional error checking (soon to
be) in master that will flag the use of incorrect NULL types for function
pointers and thus prevent such crashes.
Barry
> On Mar 20, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Praveen C wrote:
>
> It turns out the
Barry,Thanks. It helps me a lot.Five point (stencil width is one) is enough for begin.BEST,Wenbo 原始邮件 主题:Re: [petsc-maint] Question about DMDA BOUNDARY_CONDITION set发件人:Barry Smith 收件人:Wenbo Zhao 抄送:petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov,Matthew
Should have said:
make getccompiler getincludedirs getlinklibs
Satish
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Satish Balay wrote:
> Ok - Then the issue might be with your makefile. Perhaps its not a
> petsc formatted makefile.
>
> In this case - run 'make getincludedirs getlibs' in PETSC_DIR - and
> use the
Ok - Then the issue might be with your makefile. Perhaps its not a
petsc formatted makefile.
In this case - run 'make getincludedirs getlibs' in PETSC_DIR - and
use the compilers, compile/link options listed there.
Satish
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Bikash Kanungo wrote:
> Hi Satish,
>
> Yes, I ran
Hi Satish,
Yes, I ran 'make test' and it didn't throw any error. Here's my test.log:
Running test examples to verify correct installation
Using
PETSC_DIR=/home/bikashk/softwares/femdft_softwares/petsc/opt_3.7.5_mvapich2_64bit_complex
and PETSC_ARCH=
C/C++ example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex19
Did you run 'make test' after insatalling PETSc? Were there errors with this
test?
[you can send us corresponding test.log]
Satish
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Bikash Kanungo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently installed petsc-3.7.5. However, while linking petsc with my
> code, I get the following
Hi,
I have recently installed petsc-3.7.5. However, while linking petsc with my
code, I get the following compilation error:
/home/bikashk/softwares/femdft_softwares/petsc/opt_3.7.5_mvapich2_64bit_complex/include/petscdraw.h(335):
error: identifier "jmp_buf" is undefined
PETSC_EXTERN jmp_buf
I can cook up a simple example that communicates the needed ghost values for
your boundary conditions. It may take a day or two.
Are you using a five point stencil or a nine point stencil (the nine point
stencil seems "weird" for that very corner point)?
Barry
> On Mar 21, 2017,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Wenbo Zhao
wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Thanks.
>
> I want to solve neutron diffusion equations using finite difference method
> and PETSc.
> This rotation boundary condition is very common in my cases.
> Though the mesh consists of ~ 10 Miliion
Thanks for your quick answers. To be honest, I am not familiar at all with
DMShells and DMPlexes. But since it is what I need, I am going to try it.
Thanks again for your advices,
Natacha
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Lawrence Mitchell <
lawrence.mitch...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 21
Matt,
Thanks.
I want to solve neutron diffusion equations using finite difference method
and PETSc.
This rotation boundary condition is very common in my cases.
Though the mesh consists of ~ 10 Miliion structured hexahedron cells, the
mesh is simple and could be discribed by three vectors about
> On 21 Mar 2017, at 13:24, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> I think the remedy is as easy as specifying a DMShell that has a PetscSection
> (DMSetDefaultSection) with your ordering, and
> I think this is how Firedrake (http://www.firedrakeproject.org/) does it.
We actually don't
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Natacha BEREUX
wrote:
> Dear PETSc user's,
> I am trying to solve a poroelasticity problem with an additional
> temperature equation. The problem is a 3 fields problem involving a
> displacement field (u), a pressure field (p) and a
Dear PETSc user's,
I am trying to solve a poroelasticity problem with an additional
temperature equation. The problem is a 3 fields problem involving a
displacement field (u), a pressure field (p) and a temperature field (t).
I have seen similar examples in
> On Mar 21, 2017, at 3:39 AM, Praveen C wrote:
>
> Thank you.
>
> Will this fix be added to future versions or I have to apply this manually ?
I will put it in maint and master as soon as I know it isn't buggy. So within
a day or two.
Barry
>
> Best
> praveen
>
Thank you.
Will this fix be added to future versions or I have to apply this manually ?
Best
praveen
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> Sorry about that; since it involves character strings so it is something
> we currently need to do manually.
>
>
Sorry about that; since it involves character strings so it is something we
currently need to do manually.
If you are
1) using petsc 3.7 from the tar ball I've attached a patch file, apply it in
the petsc directory with patch -p1 < add-fortran-tsadaptsettype
2) if you are using petsc
Dear all
In my fortran code, I want to set to TSADAPTNONE by default. But it seems
that TSAdaptSetType does not exist in fortran. Is there a solution for this
?
Thanks
praveen
20 matches
Mail list logo