Crap! The wrong thing got pushed.
Thanks,
Matt
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:49 PM Adrian Croucher
wrote:
> Probably don't want the two extra PetscSFView() calls (lines 1687, 1688)
> though- presumably they were just for temporary debugging?
>
> - Adrian
> On 11/07/19 2:18 PM, Adrian
Probably don't want the two extra PetscSFView() calls (lines 1687, 1688)
though- presumably they were just for temporary debugging?
- Adrian
On 11/07/19 2:18 PM, Adrian Croucher wrote:
On 10/07/19 3:40 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
Sorry this took so long. I put in a PR for this:
On 10/07/19 3:40 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
Sorry this took so long. I put in a PR for this:
https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-requests/1858/knepley-fix-plex-distribute-overlap/diff
I think it fixes your problem.
Thanks very much Matt, that does fix it. Good stuff!
- Adrian
--
Dr
This is typical for weak preconditioners. Have you tried -pc_type gamg
or -pc_type mg (algebraic and geometric multigrid, respectively)? On a
structured grid with smooth coefficients, geometric multigrid is
possible with low setup cost and convergence in a few iterations
independent of problem
