> On 13 Feb 2024, at 12:33 AM, Zhang, Hong wrote:
>
> Pierre,
> I just modified the error message of MatProductSymbolic() and added a testing
> segment in src/mat/tests/ex195.c. I have not pushed my change yet.
>
> Your fix at
>
Pierre,
I just modified the error message of MatProductSymbolic() and added a testing
segment in src/mat/tests/ex195.c. I have not pushed my change yet.
Your fix at
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/commit/9dcea022de3b0309e5c16b8c554ad9c85dea29cf?merge_request_iid=7283
is more general. Has this
7279 does change the code for MatZeroRowsColumns_MPIAIJ(). But perhaps that
does not resolve the problem you are seeing? If that is the case we will need a
reproducible example so we can determine exactly what else is happening in your
code to cause the difficulties.
Here is the diff for
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 7:10 AM Jeremy Theler (External) <
jeremy.theler-...@ansys.com> wrote:
> Hi Barry
>
> > The bug fix for 2 is availabel in
> https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/7279
>
> Note that our code goes through MatZeroRowsColumns_MPIAIJ() not through
>
Hi Barry
> The bug fix for 2 is availabel in
> https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/7279
Note that our code goes through MatZeroRowsColumns_MPIAIJ() not through
MatZeroRows_MPIAIJ() so this fix does not change anything for the case I
mentioned.
--
jeremy
