On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 1:00 PM MIGUEL MOLINOS PEREZ wrote:
> I see, so I'm the one in charge of the synchronization between the
> particles and the replicas associated, right?
>
Yes. We could conceivably put this in during our rewrite of DMSwarm, but it
would change the semantics. Right now, th
I see, so I'm the one in charge of the synchronization between the particles
and the replicas associated, right?
Best,
Miguel
On Feb 25, 2024, at 6:53 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 7:21 AM MIGUEL MOLINOS PEREZ
mailto:mmoli...@us.es>> wrote:
Dear Matthew,
Thank you for an
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 7:21 AM MIGUEL MOLINOS PEREZ wrote:
> Dear Matthew,
>
> Thank you for answer me out of office hours and for the suggestion. If I
> interpret it correctly, your point is using the background mesh halo to
> identify and create ghosts particles in the overlapping region using
Dear Matthew,
Thank you for answer me out of office hours and for the suggestion. If I
interpret it correctly, your point is using the background mesh halo to
identify and create ghosts particles in the overlapping region using
DMSwarmMigrate().
Then two questions hits me:
* If I change a
