Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex distribution with custom adjacency

Coming back to this after a while. It would still be good if I could provide a callback for user-defined adjacency. Does https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/pull-requests/690/plex-support-user-defined-adjacencies-via/diff

Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex distribution with custom adjacency

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Lawrence Mitchell < lawrence.mitch...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > > > On 6 Jun 2017, at 09:01, Lawrence Mitchell ac.uk> wrote: > > > >> If you do really want to prune them, then I guess overriding the > DMPlexGetAdjacency() as you

Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex distribution with custom adjacency

> On 6 Jun 2017, at 09:01, Lawrence Mitchell > wrote: > >> If you do really want to prune them, then I guess overriding the >> DMPlexGetAdjacency() as you propose is probably the best way. I would >> be willing to put it in. Please send me a reminder email

Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex distribution with custom adjacency

> On 5 Jun 2017, at 23:01, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > To do a FEM integral on a facet f I need: > > i) to evaluate coefficients at quadrature points (on the facet) > ii) to evaluate basis functions at quadrature points (on the facet) > > for (i), I need all the dofs in

Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex distribution with custom adjacency

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lawrence Mitchell < lawrence.mitch...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > > > On 2 Jun 2017, at 05:09, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > > > > Coming back to this, I think I understand the problem a little better. > > > > Consider this mesh: > > > > ++ > >

Re: [petsc-users] DMPlex distribution with custom adjacency

> On 2 Jun 2017, at 05:09, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > Coming back to this, I think I understand the problem a little better. > > Consider this mesh: > > ++ > |\ 3 | > | \ | > |2 \ | > | \| > ++ > |\ 1 | > | \ | > |0 \ | > | \| > ++ > > Let's say I run