Re: [petsc-users] LU Performance

2019-07-05 Thread Abhyankar, Shrirang G via petsc-users
) Thanks, Shri From: petsc-users on behalf of Jed Brown via petsc-users Reply-To: Jed Brown Date: Friday, July 5, 2019 at 9:48 AM To: Stefano Zampini , Jared Crean Cc: PETSc users list Subject: Re: [petsc-users] LU Performance Stefano Zampini via petsc-users mailto:petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov

Re: [petsc-users] LU Performance

2019-07-05 Thread Jed Brown via petsc-users
Stefano Zampini via petsc-users writes: > Jared, > > The petsc output shows > > package used to perform factorization: petsc > > You are not using umfpack, but the PETSc native LU. You can run with > -options_left to see the options that are not processed from the PETSc > options database.

Re: [petsc-users] LU Performance

2019-07-05 Thread Smith, Barry F. via petsc-users
When you use Umfpack standalone do you use OpenMP threads? When you use umfpack alone do you us thread enabled BLAS/LAPACK? Perhaps OpenBLAS or MKL? You can run both cases with -ksp_view and it will print more details indicating indicating the solver used. Do you use the same