> On Oct 13, 2019, at 4:24 AM, Pierre Gubernatis via petsc-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> It souds that the best way to introduce petsc in a code is not to introduce
> it, but develop the code over the petsc structure.
>
> It is probably true but my problem is that my existing code
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 5:25 AM Pierre Gubernatis via petsc-users <
petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> It souds that the best way to introduce petsc in a code is not to
> introduce it, but develop the code over the petsc structure.
>
All things being equal, yes, but few users start
Without having seen your code, it sounds to me like the best strategy here
is to:
1) Produce a mirror of your mesh using DMStag
2) Use that DM to construct the linear block problems, which can then be
solved by PETSc
Since the PETSc grid matches your own, you can share the solution
Hello all,
It souds that the best way to introduce petsc in a code is not to introduce
it, but develop the code over the petsc structure.
It is probably true but my problem is that my existing code already is
equipped with a domain decomposition based on MPI (a typical themal
hydraulic with
