Hi All,
I just delete the .info file and it works without problem now.
Thanks,
Danyang
On 17-05-24 06:32 PM, Hong wrote:
Remove your option '-vecload_block_size 10'.
Hong
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Danyang Su > wrote:
Dear
Remove your option '-vecload_block_size 10'.
Hong
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Danyang Su wrote:
> Dear Hong,
>
> I just tested with different number of processors for the same matrix. It
> sometimes got "ERROR: Arguments are incompatible" for different number of
>
I don't think this has anything to do with the specific solver but is
because you are loading both a vector and matrix from a file and when it uses
the default parallel layout for each, because you have -matload_block_size 1
and -vecload_block_size 10 they do not get the same layout.
Dear Hong,
I just tested with different number of processors for the same matrix.
It sometimes got "ERROR: Arguments are incompatible" for different
number of processors. It works fine using 4, 8, or 24 processors, but
failed with "ERROR: Arguments are incompatible" using 16 or 48
Hi Hong,
Awesome. Thanks for testing the case. I will try your options for the
code and get back to you later.
Regards,
Danyang
On 17-05-24 12:21 PM, Hong wrote:
Danyang :
I tested your data.
Your matrices encountered zero pivots, e.g.
petsc/src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials (master)
$
Danyang :
I tested your data.
Your matrices encountered zero pivots, e.g.
petsc/src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials (master)
$ mpiexec -n 24 ./ex10 -f0 a_react_in_2.bin -rhs b_react_in_2.bin
-ksp_monitor -ksp_error_if_not_converged
[15]PETSC ERROR: Zero pivot in LU factorization:
Hi Matt,
Yes. The matrix is 45x45 sparse. The hypre takes hundreds of
iterates, not for all but in most of the timesteps. The matrix is not
well conditioned, with nonzero entries range from 1.0e-29 to 1.0e2. I
also made double check if there is anything wrong in the parallel
version,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Danyang Su wrote:
> Hi Matthew and Barry,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> I also tried superlu and mumps, both work but it is about four times
> slower than ILU(dt) prec through hypre, with 24 processors I have tested.
>
You mean the
Hi Matthew and Barry,
Thanks for the quick response.
I also tried superlu and mumps, both work but it is about four times
slower than ILU(dt) prec through hypre, with 24 processors I have
tested. When I look into the convergence information, the method using
ILU(dt) still takes 200 to 3000
> On May 24, 2017, at 2:21 AM, Danyang Su wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I use PCFactorSetLevels for ILU and PCFactorSetFill for other preconditioning
> in my code to help solve the problems that the default option is hard to
> solve. However, I found the latter one,
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Danyang Su wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I use PCFactorSetLevels for ILU and PCFactorSetFill for other
> preconditioning in my code to help solve the problems that the default
> option is hard to solve. However, I found the latter one,
11 matches
Mail list logo