On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 2:43 AM user_gong Kim wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> There are some questions about some preconditioners.
>
> The questions are from problem Au=b. The global matrix A has zero value
> diagonal terms.
>
> 1. Which preconditioner is preferred for matrix A which has zero
>
Hello,
I want to use Petsc to implement high performance computing, and I mainly
want to apply DDM methods to parallel computing. I have implemented some of
the DDM methods (such as ASM, Bjacobi, etc.), but I don't understand the
PCBDDC method. The official example
> On 16 Feb 2023, at 8:43 AM, user_gong Kim wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> There are some questions about some preconditioners.
>
> The questions are from problem Au=b. The global matrix A has zero value
> diagonal terms.
>
> 1. Which preconditioner is preferred for matrix A
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:14 AM ziming xiong
wrote:
> Hello,
> I want to use Petsc to implement high performance computing, and I mainly
> want to apply DDM methods to parallel computing. I have implemented some of
> the DDM methods (such as ASM, Bjacobi, etc.), but I don't understand the
>
On Feb 16, 2023, at 10:54 AM, Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
Hi Blaise,
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 15:17, Blaise Bourdin wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to implement a non-local finite elements reconstruction operator in parallel.
Given a dmplex distributed with an overlap, is there a
For bddc, you can also take a look at
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/blob/main/src/ksp/ksp/tutorials/ex71.c
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, 19:41 Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:14 AM ziming xiong
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I want to use Petsc to implement high performance computing,
If your matrix has the form
( A B )
( C 0 )
then often PCFIELDSPLIT can be a useful preconditioner with the option
-pc_fieldsplit_detect_saddle_point
> On Feb 16, 2023, at 2:42 AM, user_gong Kim wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> There are some questions about some
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:54 AM Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
> Hi Blaise,
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 15:17, Blaise Bourdin wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to implement a non-local finite elements reconstruction
> operator in parallel.
> >
> > Given a dmplex distributed with an overlap, is
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 16:43, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:54 AM Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> Hi Blaise,
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 15:17, Blaise Bourdin wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am trying to implement a non-local finite elements reconstruction
>> >
Hi,
I am trying to implement a non-local finite elements reconstruction operator in
parallel.
Given a dmplex distributed with an overlap, is there a way to figure out which
cells are in the overlap and which are not?
Alternatively, suppose that I distribute the same DM with and without an
Hi Blaise,
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 15:17, Blaise Bourdin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement a non-local finite elements reconstruction operator
> in parallel.
>
> Given a dmplex distributed with an overlap, is there a way to figure out
> which cells are in the overlap and which are
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 1:09 PM Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 16:43, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:54 AM Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Blaise,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 15:17, Blaise Bourdin
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >>
Jed,
It does not work for me even with the reproducer case with the small 2D
square mesh. Can you run the case that I sent and open the created
"sol.vtu" file with paraview?
Thanks,
> Thanks, Dave.
>
> Mike, can you test that this branch works with your large problems? I
> tested that .vtu
Thanks, Dave.
Mike, can you test that this branch works with your large problems? I tested
that .vtu works in parallel for small problems, where works = loads correctly
in Paraview and VisIt.
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/merge_requests/6081
Dave May writes:
> On Tue 14. Feb 2023 at
Okay, this works now. I'm pretty sure I tested this long ago with connectivity
using Int64 and found that didn't work. That may have been ancient history, but
I'm hesitant to revamp to match PetscInt. If doing that, it would require
changing the signature of DMPlexGetVTKConnectivity to use
Hello,
I have a question about rank of matrix.
At the problem
Au = b,
In my case, sometimes global matrix A is not full rank.
In this case, the global matrix A is more likely to be singular, and if it
becomes singular, the problem cannot be solved even in the case of the
direct solver.
I haven't
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023, 10:43 user_gong Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about rank of matrix.
> At the problem
> Au = b,
>
> In my case, sometimes global matrix A is not full rank.
> In this case, the global matrix A is more likely to be singular, and if it
> becomes singular, the
17 matches
Mail list logo