billy at dem.uminho.pt writes:
> Hi,
>
> Why does PETSc have a VecSetValue and not a VecGetValue?
We could introduce one, but its not usually what you want since it
would require a collective Assemble() call before you could use the value.
You can accomplish the same thing with a scatter.
billy at dem.uminho.pt writes:
> Thank you very much for your answers.
>
> I was thinking why doesn't PETSc allow functions inside functions (like
> LASPack)?
>
> h += (Diag(A) - A) * u <=> AddAsgn_VV (h, Mul_QV (Sub_QQ (Diag_Q (A), A), u));
Its an error reporting discipline since C does not a
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, abdul-rahman at tu-harburg.de wrote:
> Satish,
>
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Satish Balay wrote:
>
> > petsc-2.3.0 changelog has the following entry:
> >
> > >>>
> > -ksp_cg_Hermitian and -ksp_cg_symmetric have been changed
> > to -ksp_cg_type Hermitian or symmetric
>
> oops, th
Satish,
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Satish Balay wrote:
> petsc-2.3.0 changelog has the following entry:
>
> >>>
> -ksp_cg_Hermitian and -ksp_cg_symmetric have been changed
> to -ksp_cg_type Hermitian or symmetric
oops, thanks for pointing it out. It works as above. However, I still have
problem with t
Thank you very much for your answers.
I was thinking why doesn't PETSc allow functions inside functions (like
LASPack)?
h += (Diag(A) - A) * u <=> AddAsgn_VV (h, Mul_QV (Sub_QQ (Diag_Q (A), A), u));
Billy
Quoting Matthew Knepley :
> Hong Zhang writes:
>
> I would recommend the later
