building libraries

2006-06-01 Thread Satish Balay
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Satish Balay wrote: > Looks like you are not using PETSc makefiles. This is the recommended > thing to do. I intend to say 'The recommended method is to use PETSc makefiles'. Satish

building libraries

2006-06-01 Thread Matthew Knepley
> > I was wondering if someone could point to how i can do that. (Is there > an > > > option that i overlooked?) > > > > > > thanks > > > mat > > -- "Failure has a thousand explanations. Success doesn't need one" -- Sir Alec Guiness -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20060601/fd228ce4/attachment.htm>

building libraries

2006-06-01 Thread Satish Balay
Did you try PETSc examples before attempting your code? Do they work? Looks like you are not using PETSc makefiles. This is the recommended thing to do. If you want to have your own makefiles - do the following - and make sure all the comile options you see are listed in your makefile. cd src/ks

building libraries

2006-06-01 Thread Matt Funk
Thanks for the replies, the whole mpicc is a little system specific. It build the libraries after all, so it's fine. However, now i got another question. I link the libraries into my program, and then in my top level code i include petscksp.h. When i try to compile it, it gives me the followi