PaStiX crash

2009-10-20 Thread Andreas Grassl
Hello, I wanted to use PaStix and have the problem, that the debugging version works and PETSc compiled with option --with-debugging=0 gives following error: what could be wrong? ++ + PaStiX : Parallel Sparse

PaStiX crash

2009-10-20 Thread Satish Balay
Perhaps you can try running in valgrind to see here the problem is. You can also try --with-debugging=0 COPTFLAGS='-g -O' - and see if it crashes. If so - run in a debugger to determine the problem. Satish On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Andreas Grassl wrote: Hello, I wanted to use PaStix and have

GMRES performance

2009-10-20 Thread jaru...@ascomp.ch
Hello, I would like to know some information about GMRES performance in PETSc if you have any experience. I am running a parallel test case(9300 cells) comparing cpu time using by solvers in Petsc. While BICGSTAB was doing 0.9 sec, GMRES 15 sec with the same preconditioner(Additive

GMRES performance

2009-10-20 Thread Matthew Knepley
their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20091020/f7c08ec5/attachment.htm

PaStiX crash

2009-10-20 Thread Barry Smith
Run with valgrind (www.valgrind.org). Valgrind is simply the MOST important software tool for C/C++ developers available in the past 10+ years. First run the debug version in valgrind, because often there can be memory errors that don't crash the program and valgrind will find them.

GMRES performance

2009-10-20 Thread Barry Smith
On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:52 AM, jarunan at ascomp.ch wrote: Hello, I would like to know some information about GMRES performance in PETSc if you have any experience. I am running a parallel test case(9300 cells) comparing cpu time using by solvers in Petsc. While BICGSTAB was doing 0.9

How to get more detailed output in make.log

2009-10-20 Thread Keita Teranishi
, Keita Teranishi Scientific Library Group Cray, Inc. keita at cray.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20091020/8df0d63e/attachment.htm

How to get more detailed output in make.log

2009-10-20 Thread Barry Smith
make ACTION=lib tree Barry On Oct 20, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Keita Teranishi wrote: Hi, In PETSc, makefile in the top directory produces make.log, which shows only file names that have been compiled, but we?d like to see more detailed output like interaction with compiler commands

How to get more detailed output in make.log

2009-10-20 Thread Satish Balay
Usually the header at the begining lists these compiler options separately. But if you want the extra info - you can do: make ACTION=lib tree Note: this is not exactly the same build as the default build ['libfast' attempts to compile multiple files with a sigle command - whereas 'lib' does one