On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Hoang Giang Bui wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Jan 14, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>> >
>> > Hoang Giang Bui writes:
>> >> One
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> > On Jan 14, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> >
> > Hoang Giang Bui writes:
> >> One more question I like to ask, which is more on the performance of the
> >> solver. That if
Why P2/P2 is not for co-located discretization? However, it's not my
question. The P2/P1 which I used generate variable block size at each node.
That was fine if I used PCFieldSplitSetIS for each components,
displacements and pressures. But how to set the block size (3) for
displacement block?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Hoang Giang Bui wrote:
> Why P2/P2 is not for co-located discretization? However, it's not my
> question. The P2/P1 which I used generate variable block size at each node.
> That was fine if I used PCFieldSplitSetIS for each components,
>
Hoang Giang Bui writes:
> Why P2/P2 is not for co-located discretization?
Matt typed "P2/P2" when me meant "P2/P1".
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature