A strange behavior I am observing is:
Problem: I have to solve A*x=rhs, and currently I am currently trying to
solve for a system where I know the exact solution. I have initialized the
exact solution in the Vec x_exact.
MatMult(A, x_exact, dummy);// Storing the value of A*x_exact in dummy
Thank you for the inputs.
I tried Barry' s suggestion to use SuperLU, but the solution does not
converge and on doing -ksp_monitor -ksp_converged_reason. I get the
following error:-
240 KSP Residual norm 1.722571678777e+07
Linear solve did not converge due to DIVERGED_DTOL iterations 240
For some
Rodrigo Felicio writes:
> Hello all,
>
> Sorry for the newbie question, but is there a way of making petsc4py work
> with an MPI group or subcommunicator? I saw a solution posted back in 2010
> (http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2010-May/006382.html),
It works. Thanks!
On 04/10/2017 03:14 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
SNESSetMaxLinearSolveFailures() or -snes_max_linear_solve_fail 1000 (use some
large number here).
On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Ping He wrote:
Dear all,
I am using SNES for an incompressible flow
If you need to use SuperLU_DIST, the pivoting is done statically, using
maximum weighted matching, so the small diagonals are usually taken care as
well. It is not as good as partial pivoting, but works most of the time.
Sherry
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Barry Smith
SNESSetMaxLinearSolveFailures() or -snes_max_linear_solve_fail 1000 (use some
large number here).
> On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Ping He wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am using SNES for an incompressible flow problem. I choose the
> preconditioned matrix-free Newton
I would suggest using ./configure --download-superlu and then when running
the program -pc_type lu -pc_factor_mat_solver_package superlu
Note that this is SuperLU, it is not SuperLU_DIST. Superlu uses partial
pivoting for numerical stability so should be able to handle the small or zero
Hello all,
Sorry for the newbie question, but is there a way of making petsc4py work with
an MPI group or subcommunicator? I saw a solution posted back in 2010
(http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2010-May/006382.html), but it
does not work for me. Indeed, if I try to use
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Mark Adams wrote:
> You seem to have two levels here and 3M eqs on the fine grid and 37 on
> the coarse grid.
37 is on the sub domain.
rows=18145, cols=18145 on the entire coarse grid.
> I don't understand that.
>
> You are also calling