Hi Satish --- I am trying GNU. I am configuring with these additional
flags, and it seems to be past that point. I will let you know if it works
fine all the way.
The reason I am not using prebuilt PETSc on NERSC is that I want to be
consistent with C++, C, and fortran
compilers with all the 3rd
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Satish Balay wrote:
> 1. cray provides prebuilt petsc libraries. Does that work for you?
>
> 2. verylikely you need:
>
> --with-clib-autodetect=0
> --with-cxxlib-autodetect=0
Also
--with-fortranlib-autodetect=0
> LIBS=-lstdc++
>
> If it doesn't work - send
Marius,
We don't provide a way to insert a "generic" sparse matrix into a bigger
matrices (dense matrices coming from element stiffness matrices yes) so I don't
see any simple solution. Does the submatrix you pull out have any particular
structure, what does it represent?
Barry
> On
1. cray provides prebuilt petsc libraries. Does that work for you?
2. verylikely you need:
--with-clib-autodetect=0
--with-cxxlib-autodetect=0
LIBS=-lstdc++
If it doesn't work - send configure.log
Satish
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Amneet Bhalla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build PETSc
We always need configure.log (it has all the information about what went
wrong).
--with-c++-support shouldn't exist as an option.
Barry
> On Jan 29, 2018, at 10:05 PM, Amneet Bhalla wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build PETSc (v3.7.7) locally in my home
Hi,
I am trying to build PETSc (v3.7.7) locally in my home directory on NERSC
(Edison).
However, I am getting the following error during the configuration stage.
===
TESTING: checkFortranNameMangling from
Hi !
I have the followng problem. I create a Submatrix containing a subset of row/columns of the original matrix. After some matrix multiplications the non-zero strucutre of the resulting matrix changed. Now I want to insert this submatix back into the original one keeping only the non-zero
> On Jan 29, 2018, at 3:18 AM, Ali Berk Kahraman
> wrote:
>
> Yes, that is exactly what I am trying to do.
>
> In the documentation it says that MatGetRow cannot be used to alter the
> entries, it is only for examining them. So if I understand correctly, do you
>
Yes, that is exactly what I am trying to do.
In the documentation it says that MatGetRow cannot be used to alter the
entries, it is only for examining them. So if I understand correctly, do
you suggest:
1:MatGetRow, get the row
2:MatSetValues, set the values
3:Do not call assembly, instead