Re: [petsc-users] MatSolve_SeqAIJ_NaturalOrdering

Randall Mackie writes: > After profiling our code, we have found that most of the time is spent in > MatSolve_SeqAIJ_NaturalOrdering, which upon inspection is just doing simple > forward and backward solves of already factored ILU matrices. > > We think that we should be

[petsc-users] MatSolve_SeqAIJ_NaturalOrdering

After profiling our code, we have found that most of the time is spent in MatSolve_SeqAIJ_NaturalOrdering, which upon inspection is just doing simple forward and backward solves of already factored ILU matrices. We think that we should be able to see improvement by replacing these with